Can We Have Tea During Fasts

change of heart? OUR

Top 4: Löschwasser-/Trinkwasserversorgung Neuhengstett was in the 29th council meeting April at the request of Günter Ayasse (CDU Association) by Mayor Dr. Götz without a vote taken from the agenda . Günter Ayasse also expressed on behalf of the Free / Independent Voters Association's desire to consider alternatives more carefully. were not the only ones

in the preliminary approval in the TA - The two Greens Gisela Gröger and Klaus Rohbeck ! - believe that the issue was not discussed in public according to its importance.

was what this agenda item?

future should there be for Neuhengstett no black forest water!
going since about 2004, the investigation of the water network by the RBS wave. Water supply and pressure in accordance Neuhengstett seem not to comply (Worksheet W405). The same problem was Ottenbronn in 2006 by the construction of a second Loop (for now?) Solved. (No question of cost!)

of problems in Neuhengstett was so far no talk!
Only in the years 2007 to 2009 were set in the medium-term budgetary planning by 2013 a total of 590.000 Euros for measures to "increase the water supply, improvement of the pressure and the fire power. "

happen is unfortunately nothing yet!

wave The investigation of the RBS (known so far no local council!) Remained in the drawer and was first excavated in October 2008.

drinking water is our most important!
Neuhengstetts The population was far from the planned change little with (intent?), Because only a flat fee rather sparse of "Water supply" was mentioned. Who would suspect there can show that this same serious impact on the drinking water supply Neuhengstetts has? In general, in the last 20 years in veiled reference to the actual composition of drinking water Neuhengstetter much ....

transparency is different.
Why was / is there no public meeting / information (such as the planned animal rescue center and the Täfelberg)?
The only credible alternative instead of pure water of Lake Constance, according to a high template container - with extra costs in the amount of 400,000 €. The listed as a disadvantage inefficient solution (increase in operating costs) is not understandable, as for example in December 2008 completed the elevated tank Security of supply in Möttlingen for us only an increase of water price of 1.15 € to 1.18 in 2009 means.
And the reasoning in the TA session, the representatives of the 18 unitary councils would be acceptable to when a vote is only the "cheaper" version is not acceptable (Althengstett is the largest customer in the end, association and has 6 representatives) - if it does not even try is!
The cheapest option for 210,000 €, which lays in maintaining the composition of drinking water installation 2-3 fire water tanks in Neuhengstett before - what is it?
It is not only the hardness, of from 5.6 to 9 degrees increases (with eg more rinsing, washing and Entkalkungsmittelverbrauch) the higher nitrate and possibly in the houses required installation of pressure reducing valves, but a further departure from the regional water supply, to a supply, by their cross-border leasing transactions million losses "earned" has unpredictable consequences for the price of water .

It was only recently that everything possible should be retained in his own hand. It will not be dependent (see connection of the sewage plant Ottenbronn: Instead of following the natural slope to Hirsau the entire Otten Bronner Wastewater for a lot of money rather than to Neuhengstett Althengstett pumped up the mountain) - it was much more important in drinking water are just as thought and acted.

addition, the population must be fully informed before this decision.

Althengstett 29 April 2009, Klaus Rohbeck